'British Poetry Essay\r'

'The comparison and contrast of Wilfred Owen’s and Rupert Brooke’s approaches to the subject of contend The Sol clearr by Rupert Brooke and Dulce et decorousness Est by Wilfred Owen were both(prenominal) written during world contend matchless. War and remnant are the themes of both numberss but they are written from different perspectives. The two poets take different approaches in portraying the effect that war has on the mountain involved. The Soldier by Rupert Brooke idealises and glorifies war tour Dulce Et Decorum Est by Wilfred Owen highlights the horror and cruelty of war.\r\nWilfred Owen gives the contributor the word-painting that war is horrible and that dying for integrity’s country is not all the glory and pay back that it seems, and that in reality, dying in a war, no matter for what cause, can be both excruciating and full of suffering, while Rupert Brooke, on the other hand, gives the reader the impression that dying in war for one ’s country, is very honourable, and glorious. In ‘Soldier’, Brooke expresses his chouse for England and how he believes it is right to fight and die for his country.\r\nHowever, Brooke never knew what war was uniform, as he died in 1915. Therefore, his poem is very idealistic. This is expressed when he writes, â€Å"… in that location is a corner of a foreign field that is incessantly England”. Here, he sees the English soldiers’ bodies as parts of England. If they die on foreign soil, that land will be forever part of England because their soul remains there along with their values and love for England. Brooke does not describe the horrible nature of death in war and only tells how the soldier honors England by dying while defending the nation.\r\nHe evokes positive feelings toward the war and describes optimistically the soldiers’ thoughts once the war has finished by victimisation words like â€Å"happy dreams” and †Å"laughter” By contrast, Wilfred Owen uses irony to portray war not as a glorious duty but as a barbaric massacre. â€Å"Dulce et decorum est/ pro patri mori” which typify: â€Å"it is sweet and honorable to die for one‘s country”. He considers this a lie for close soldiers after they see and live the reality of the war as soldiers. War can not be called sweet but horrible. Owen opposes to the idea of struggle in a war. Wilfred Owen focuses on the tragedy of war and the conditions of the soldiers.\r\nFor example, he depicts the soldiers as â€Å"Bent double, like old beggars under(a) sacks”. Generally, one thinks of a soldier as a man full of strength, who looks brave with his uniform and boundary confidently to war. In contrast, Owen tries to make the soldiers look like penniless men and gives a sense of their non-glorified reality. Their uniforms, their psychological and physical health are destroyed. That shows how the battle has in earnest d amaged the spirits of the soldiers. As can be easily seen, Brooke’s poem supports fighting for one’s country and patriotism, whereas Owen’s poem questions the reasons for fighting a war.\r\n'