How Happy could Gay Men be in a Homophobic Society such as Ours Essay

Homosexuality is no lasting an undisclosed idea amongst us, and their existence in our society is no nightlong a question to be brocaded. As we k instantaneously, they enter the same shops we reproof every now and wherefore they ride the same buses and sub modes we catch they mountain pass the same streets we tread everyday they breathe the same air we do, all in all for one apparent reason they are no less hu whilee than any(prenominal) of us in this society could possibly be.Despite the parking lot knowledge we all have ab pop the existence of these sight who all at once came out from the box, it notwithstanding raises several(predicate) reactions from the crowd of the so called normal tidy sumas the society itself may refer to it. While others have erudite to accept the given fact that there is a possibility of revise to the socially set standard of normality, such as this one on the area of g residuumer, there are still some who just couldnt practice the act of co existence with these so called new breeds. There are still people who religiously believe that the defiance of the norm such as crossing from one gender to another(prenominal) is absolutely unacceptable. Given this reality, a lot of attempts have been made to somehow sway these people out of their enclosed bubbles. Even media, one of the or so influential ele ments in our society, took a step further by recognizing the existence of hardys and lesbians in their projects themed after different slices of life kindred the top notching series depart & embellish, and the award-winning movie Philadelphia.With peoples warm embrace with the idea in moving pictures, it seemed no far from the possibility that they could, one way or another, welcome the idea in reality with open harness the yet question re chief(prenominal)ing is how wide open could these people ex track down their arms based on what their televisions feed them? According to Marisa Conolly on her article authorise Hom osexuality on Television The Heterosexualization of Will & Grace in Print Media, despite the television show Will & Graces attempt to promote the normality of the existence of aerial men in the society, the show wasnt able to fully liberate the misunderstood bunch.Intentionally or not, certain limitations have been set by the express show, leaving unnecessary provisions among viewers which they could refer to in legal injury of classifying homosexuality unacceptable and acceptable for the publics eyes. Generally, Will, one of the main characters of the utter show who happens to play a part of a suppositional homosexual, was somehow portrayed in a heterosexual manner his untarnished association with Grace, a true female character, shades the scene to a different color.Their supposed friendship was brought into a different heterosexual fence in of relationship, wherein platonic is brought into a twisted romantic anglesomehow word picture him caught in between the certa inty of homosexuality and the tendency to lean on heterosexuality. Unfortunately, their possible interest to sell is totally negating the promotion of the other, thus making it more(prenominal) complicated for the viewers whether to absorb him as a problematical gay who precisely hears realisation, or as a male, in the pose of an identity crisis, still clinging on the idealism of heterosexuality through guileful dramatization of his relationship with a straight woman.The same idea was raised in the film Philadelphia by Jonathan Demme. On the said movie, instead deliberateness through the inconsistency of the perceived representation of character, the viewers are simply being caught in the middle of a life and death situation. instead of making their viewers understand the real score within the completion of reality that the film itself is providing, they are subconsciously redefining pity as a substitute for this understanding. They have misused the forthcoming of death to the gay parts advantage by playing on it as if tell Hey, I am dying now of AIDS, and I am gay. in a flash that I testament be leaving this mortal place soon, give you please have the compassion of accepting me for who I really am? Personally, I dont think that this is the proper way of educating the people because it is basically misleading. Though the dickens groups are closely knitted by its constant reception of seclusion from the society, it is unfair to define being gay no different from having AIDS. Being gay is not a acerb viral disease like AIDS it is simply a way of life that is, more often than not, being misunderstood.Upon watching the film, I was left wing caught at the vagueness of Denzel Washingtons character. I thought at premiere that he will be the one responsible to set quit Tom Hanks character, barely by the end of the film, my hopes were dropped on the floor. His supposed homophobia, which I first thought will be the vital element he has as one of the lead character, somehow got lost in the last mentioned part of the story. The issue tackled dealt mainly on Hanks viral illness and how most people generally react to itgiving the homosexuality issue, which is more widespread in reality, a weak standpoint.The common ground between the two different portrayals of gay men stated above is its tendency to seek for conditions before genuinely opening the idea of acceptance. For television sitcom Will & Grace, they sought for a subtle way to conform with the norms by partially heterosexualizing the gay character, while for the movie Philadelphia, they played with emotions, most specifically guilt, by bringing into their attention that death is an uneventful future for the character.Basically, in their own particular ways, they are always looking for certain kink holes to pull off gayness acceptablemeaning gayness itself defines no reason to stand on its own. In this case, their uncritical viewers tend to get accustomed in looking f or such passages before they actually accept certain circumstances, which unfortunately not every gay man has. In the end, publication of ideas and slices of life such as these only implies that as time passed by the society is still keeping its doors closed to the acquaintance of homosexualitys existence.Again it only shows the greatest weakness that any society has a fear of the unordinary. They are not exactly sacking but rather a form of deception in enjoin to switch the attention of the critical public regarding their claim for ample recognition to homosexuals. None of these moving images placed a dot at the end of the statement we accept homosexuality instead, they only made the issue more complex than ever by adding up the condition if and only if to the said declaration. If the shows themselves couldnt accept the fact that gay men exist, how could their viewers do?I could give credit for the attempt pull out gays and lesbians from their malicious-satirical class of simp ly being unpleasant, loud and mischievous, but still, that doesnt make it tolerable for me. Compassion may be the trounce way to seek approval, but seeking proofs out of the ordinary and passing it off as the outmatch solution is nothing but a substandard achievement. Homosexuality isnt actually an issue seeking for a special(prenominal) treatment that will be way too much for a goal now that it couldnt even reach the approval of being lined up on the average level.All gays and lesbians need is the chance to be tempered in a normal wayno more and no less than how people accept heterosexualswhere in they are not shoved outside as if they are infectious beasts. Since media started this crooked representation of homosexuality on screen in the first place, I believe that they will be the only one who could correct this. Next time they produce best selling stories about homosexuals on their reels, they should try taking away those special cases that tend to sensationalize their stori eslike exploring Wills manly side as a gay man and Hanks incurable illness.If they want to represent gay men as part of the normal sector in our society, then they could probably represent them as simple as being another friendly neighbor from the block without a semi-romantic relationship with a straight female, but rather a nonchalant relationship with another man, or a successful attorney who need not die at the end of the story just to gain recognition for his success as a lawyer instead, he could just be another lawyer who saved the dayroles as simple as that, just like most heterosexuals portray.In that way, it will seem to be more true-to-life(prenominal) and fair for these people who usually live under the shadow of our judgmental society.