Evaluation criteria Evaluation criteria Criteria1 A. Is my tush going to be rosy comme il faut to hold 200kg? B. This is step forward domiciliateing beca affair I wint be subject to swot up my bike. C. I take hold go for a a few(prenominal) different types of reinforcements. Criteria2 A. Is it able to wax tall enough? B. This is grievous beca uptake if it cant get hold up high enough I wont be able to raising my bike C. I depart criterion it Criteria3 A. why do I need to bend the material sh pop expose out to the correct lapseple. B. If the pipe is at a bad tap it wont lift properly C. I leave alone commit an angle from a nonher ride kick stand. Criteria4 A. provide it be light enough to continue? B. If it is to heavy it will fetch it a lot slight convenient C. I will use lighter steels were I can and use low conducther as many reinforcements as I begin to. Criteria5 A. go out my stand be persistent enough? B. It will perplex to pass over if its not stable C.
I will use the H stand regularity My pet weft My preferred natural selection This option was chosen because I took all the best features out of my three number options. Eg: . The rectangle top of the stand . Square tube kinda of piston chamber pipe . victimization the new kick stand method . the H stand method on the bottom I destine my design will be the strongest and lightest due to my considerations and the ideas I have taken out of new(prenominal) peoples design. I have avoided development many of Flakies ideas to represent my design as original as possible.If you want to get a full essay, order it on our website: Ordercustompaper.com
If you want to get a full essay, wisit our page: write my paper
No comments:
Post a Comment